Palo Alto, CA, USA
2017
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-60702 is a vulnerability in the Core component of Oracle WebLogic Server, part of Oracle Fusion Middleware, that allows a low-privileged attacker with network access over the T3 or IIOP protocols to compromise the server. Oracle published the issue on August 18, 2026, as part of its August 2026 Critical Security Patch Update. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.9 (Critical).
  |  By Igal Zeifman
An unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the jsonArrayContains filter function in GeoTools, the geospatial library that underpins GeoServer. When an OGC filter is evaluated against a PostGIS data store, the value passed to jsonArrayContains is written into the generated SQL statement without escaping, allowing an attacker to alter the query the database executes.
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-19478 is a code injection vulnerability in GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition, caused by improper handling of a GraphQL directive in the application’s API layer. GitLab disclosed the issue and shipped fixes in an ad hoc critical patch release on August 17, 2026, outside its normal twice-monthly security schedule. The vulnerability carries a CVSS base score of 9.4 (Critical) as assigned by GitLab. Exploitation requires no authentication and no user interaction.
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-71362 is an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) in Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source, caused by the platform failing to correctly bind a customer identity to an account session. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (Critical). Exploitation requires no authentication. Adobe’s advisory states that the flaw is exploitable without credentials, does not require administrator privileges, and does not require user interaction.
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-26035 is an improper authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in Fortinet FortiWeb, disclosed by Fortinet on August 12, 2026 in advisory FG-IR-26-158 under the title “Broken access control in the RADIUS type admin group.” The flaw sits in FortiWeb’s remote RADIUS administrator authentication path, where the appliance fails to correctly validate an administrative login before granting access.
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-72766 is a type confusion vulnerability in the Send Email node of n8n, an open-source workflow automation platform. The node does not enforce that its message fields hold string values, so a non-string value arriving from a workflow expression can be passed through to the underlying mail library, Nodemailer, which interprets it as a file path or a URL rather than message text. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (High). Under CVSS v4.0 it scores 8.2 (High).
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-20349 is a denial of service vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software. The flaw stems from insufficient error checking when the service processes HTTP requests. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.6 (High). Cisco tracks it under CWE-244.
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-34265 is a memory corruption vulnerability in the Application Server ABAP component of SAP NetWeaver and the ABAP Platform. The flaw stems from logical errors in how the SAP kernel parses DIAG protocol messages, the proprietary protocol that carries traffic between the SAP GUI presentation layer and the application server. Malformed input reaching the parser leads to an out-of-bounds write, classified as CWE-787. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical).
  |  By Igal Zeifman
CVE-2026-58048 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the database management functionality of cPanel & WHM, the hosting control panel developed by WebPros. An authenticated cPanel account holder with access to the MySQL/MariaDB database feature can execute arbitrary database commands with full administrative privileges, rather than being confined to the databases and grants tied to their own account. The CVE record carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.4 (Critical).
  |  By Jenny Salem
Two weeks ago I sat in on a webinar where CyCognito’s founders walked through continuous AI pentesting. The framing stayed with me: the pentest itself has not changed, only who runs each part of it. AI has reached nearly every corner of cybersecurity, and pentesting is no exception. The promise is an agent that probes applications, uncovers flaws scanners miss, and delivers a report before a human tester has finished scoping the engagement.
  |  By CyCognito
Join CyCognito’s CEO Rob N. Gurzeev and Commvault’s Ben Herzberg to uncover what enforcing data security at scale actually requires and how to close the gap between policy and ground truth.
  |  By CyCognito
-Recent breaches show AI risk is already present in many environments, often entering through suppliers, data flows, and integrations. But awareness alone is not enough. CISOs and security leaders must actively manage the expanded attack surface AI creates. In this session, experts from CyCognito and Panorays help you understand how to identify AI relationships, assess the risks they pose, and remediate vulnerabilities before they lead to an incident. You’ll learn.
  |  By CyCognito
See the CyCognito platform in action to understand how it can help you identify, prioritize and eliminate your most critical risks.
  |  By CyCognito
"CyCognito is worth every cent we pay and it helps me sleep better because I know we’re checking our internet-facing assets on a regular basis.” —Benjamin Bachmann | Vice President, Group CISO | Ströer.
  |  By CyCognito
“CyCognito provides our company with cutting-edge technology enabling my team to have global visibility into our web-facing assets in an easy-to-use interface.” — Alex Schuchman | Chief Information Security Officer | Colgate-Palmolive Company.
  |  By CyCognito
“I can’t point to another tool that does as thorough a job of exploring and exposing those assets that you didn’t even know you had. It’s so valuable." — Kevin Kealy | Chief Information Security Officer | Scientific Games.
  |  By CyCognito
See How CyCognito Monitors Your Subsidiaries for Security Risk.
  |  By CyCognito
Learn how the CyCognito platform identifies attack vectors that might go undetected by other security solutions.
  |  By CyCognito
Introducing Remediation Planner and new workflow integrations.
  |  By CyCognito
Your attack surface has grown, it's now in cloud infrastructure and across subsidiaries and unknown, unmanaged assets are everywhere. How are you finding these? Attackers look for, find and attack these unknown assets and when there are externally exposed risks, sensitive data and critical systems are put in danger. Read now, External Exposure & Attack Surface Management For Dummies.
  |  By CyCognito
CTEM, a comprehensive risk reduction framework, integrates visibility risk assessment, issue prioritization, and validation. This approach facilitates the continuous identification and testing of exposed systems, enhancing decision-making and enabling a more proactive threat response. Download the white paper, Understanding Continuous Threat Exposure Management, to learn about CTEM's core components and how they contribute to cybersecurity resilience, how CTEM addresses the challenge of managing risk on attack surfaces, and how CyCognito's capabilities align with CTEM's requirements.
  |  By CyCognito
With the ever-growing volume of cybersecurity alerts and attacks bombarding security teams, more CISOs are taking a hard look at External Attack Surface Management (EASM) platforms to better understand how adversaries get into systems and how to keep them out. It's not surprising that EASM products have captured the industry's attention, as many organizations are seeing growth of their attack surfaces' growth outpace their detection and remediation abilities. Some of the driving causes: digital transformation, the cloud, third-party dependencies, subsidiary sprawl, and more.
  |  By CyCognito
Your pen testing team is working hard, but they are facing an operational challenge due to the large number of assets they need to test and the time required to complete each test. As the fundamental approach to penetration testing has not changed much since the first test over 50 years ago, it's worth exploring whether the tool is still sufficient for securing today's IT environment.

CyCognito solves one of the most fundamental business problems in cybersecurity: seeing how attackers view your organization, where they are most likely to break in, what systems and assets are at risk and how you can eliminate the exposure.

Founded by national intelligence agency veterans, CyCognito has a deep understanding of how attackers exploit blind spots and a path of least resistance. Based in Palo Alto, CyCognito serves a number of large enterprises and Fortune 500 organizations, including Colgate-Palmolive, Tesco and many others.

Automated external attack surface management and continuous testing reduces your overall risk:

  • Discovery: Proactively uncover exposed external assets — without input or configuration — using attacker reconnaissance approaches.
  • Contextualization: Empower your team to know what an asset does, where it’s located, what other assets it connects to, and how attractive it is from that attacker perspective.
  • Active Security Testing: Launch security testing across your full inventory of external assets, enabling a new level of visibility into risk and the steps needed to reduce it.
  • Prioritization: Automate risk prioritization for external assets to focus your security team’s attention and energy on the 10 to 50 most critical exploited assets that matter the most.
  • Remediation Acceleration: Quickly repair exploitable assets and reduce validation time from months to hours to swiftly prevent data breaches.

Discover, test and prioritize all of your web assets and applications.