Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

The risks associated with privileged accounts have significantly escalated recently. According to the 2025 Cost of Insider Risks Report by Ponemon Institute, insiders who fall victim to credential theft now represent the most expensive risk, with an average per-incident cost surging to $779,797 — up from $679,621 in 2023. When stolen credentials belong to privileged accounts, the potential damage is even greater.

In the world of cybersecurity, this statement couldn’t be more relevant. Trust is the invisible thread that binds a company to its customers, partners, investors, and even its employees. It’s what gives users the confidence to share their personal data, stakeholders the faith to invest, and teams the motivation to innovate. But trust is fragile, especially in a digital age where one breach can unravel years of credibility in a matter of minutes.

Cybersecurity researchers uncovered what is being called the "mother of all breaches," a colossal dataset containing 16 billion login credentials, including user passwords for Google, Facebook, and Apple. To put that figure in context, the cache represents twice the current human population of the Earth. This event was not the result of a single breach, but likely a compilation of data stolen from multiple breaches over many years.

As a security leader, you face an inevitable daily reality: a flood of alerts pouring in from dozens of different tools. Risky sign-ins are flagged in Microsoft 365, weak passwords are pinged from a vault audit, and a separate report identifies which employees failed the latest phishing simulation. While all this information is valuable, most leaders are unable to connect these separate data points to paint a clear, cohesive picture of an individual user’s overall risk.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are two essential and well-known regulations designed to protect user data. However, despite the similarities, there are major differences between them. To help you gain more clarity on GDPR vs CCPA, we will explain the similarities and differences, so you can understand more about how both can help you manage your data. Table of contents.

As the attack surface expands and the number of vulnerabilities grows, organizations face a new crisis: how to prioritize which vulnerabilities to fix first based on their level of risk. CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management addresses this challenge with new AI-powered capabilities to help defenders identify what matters most and take action with precision. New innovations include AI-powered Asset Criticality, Client-Side Attack Path Analysis, and a CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM integration.

Cyber attackers exploit legitimate tools, ClickFix attacks accelerate, and BlueNoroff targets macOS devices.

In architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC), collaboration across firms isn’t optional—it’s fundamental. Whether you’re working with architects, consultants, general contractors, or subcontractors, sharing data efficiently is critical to project success. Yet, most file-sharing methods between firms are outdated, risky, and operationally difficult.

Infostealers don’t behave like traditional malware. They work silently in the browser — the client side — harvesting saved passwords, session tokens, credit card data, and more. Attackers use common browser behaviors (JavaScript execution, third-party scripts, DOM manipulations) to: These threats often bypass traditional server-side or endpoint protection, making them invisible to most security tools unless you’re monitoring the browser itself.

Calico Enterprise lets users write network policies using domain names instead of IP addresses. This is done by dynamically mapping domain names to IP addresses and matching the egress traffic against these IPs. We have discussed this feature in detail when we introduced the Inline mode for the eBPF data plane in Calico Enterprise 3.20 release! It addresses the latency and performance issues of the various modes used by Calico in iptables/nftables data planes.