Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

OpenStack has long been the go-to platform for building private clouds, but its architecture, particularly the control plane, has undergone a significant transformation in the 15 years since its inception. The original design, a tightly coupled 3-node control plane, provided a stable foundation but presented challenges in scalability, resilience, and operational complexity.

Hi all! I am Rodolfo. I have been working in IT for more than 25 years, since Solaris 2.6, and I’ve seen a lot of changes on the industry. Can you imagine the difference between Solaris 2.6 and Kubernetes? How things were managed then and how they are managed now?

Docker and OpenShift solve different problems in containerization. Docker creates and runs containers, while OpenShift manages container deployments at enterprise scale using Kubernetes underneath it. Docker vs. Openshift isn’t about choosing one over the other but rather understanding which tool fits your specific use case. Docker excels at application packaging and local development. OpenShift handles production orchestration, security policies, and multi-team environments.

Ransomware attacks target your backups before anything else. Recent data shows that two-thirds of organizations faced ransomware in the past two years, with attackers specifically hunting backup infrastructure to eliminate recovery options. Once your backups are gone, you’re left with two choices: Pay up or lose your data permanently.

Historically, agent-based backup systems have been the norm. These systems operate by running software on the production machine, in tandem with the production application. The agent must communicate with its central data protection server for backups to be executed. The agent’s role is to read production data through the OS layer, process it, and transmit backup data to a media or backup server, where it is ultimately stored on a typically proprietary backup storage device.

Losing a MySQL database without a backup means losing customer records, transactions, and your business’s good reputation. Whether you’re running a single application or managing containerized workloads, you need a backup strategy that works when disaster strikes. The challenge isn’t just creating backups but making sure that they’re consistent, they’re recoverable, and they match your recovery time objectives.

Backup windows that stretch into business hours create real problems for IT teams. Synthetic backup fixes the problem by letting teams reconstruct complete backup sets without touching production systems. The process combines your last full backup with incremental changes, creating a fresh full backup entirely offline. This approach cuts backup windows by 60-80% compared to traditional methods.

Security architecture separates successful container deployments from costly data breaches. When comparing Rancher against OpenShift, organizations must examine how each platform handles access controls, compliance frameworks, and disaster recovery protocols. Both platforms manage Kubernetes clusters effectively, but their security models take different approaches. OpenShift integrates Red Hat’s enterprise security stack with built-in image scanning and strict pod security standards.

Managed service providers (MSPs) struggle with protecting client data across multiple environments while controlling costs. MSP backup software solves this problem through centralized management and multi-tenant architecture that lets you handle hundreds of clients from one dashboard instead of juggling separate systems for each customer.

Container runtime security becomes critical once your applications go live. Most security breaches happen during runtime, not the build phase. Configuration changes, unexpected network traffic, and privilege escalation attempts can compromise even containers that passed all pre-deployment security scans.