Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

How Insurity Cut Manual Security Work by 81%

95 hours back. Every. Single. Month. One of the many outcomes from our ZTA journey with Insurity. They didn’t just deploy Zero Trust — they operationalized it. Reach unified controls, automated remediation, and eliminated the manual effort slowing progress. Results:︎ 81% less manual work︎ 95 hours saved per employee per month︎ Months → days for rollout︎ Zero Trust that sticks.

Building Security With Customers, Not For Them - Jay Wilson x Garrett Hamilton | Insurity Case Study

Partnership over Procurement Why true collaboration between vendors and security teams is still rare — not because the intent isn’t there, but because most engagements stop at feature checklists. The alternative is more interesting: build together, solve together, and create solutions that fit how teams actually work rather than how tools assume they work. This mindset drove our work with Insurity — a real example of what happens when a security team engages deeply instead of treating tooling as a finished product.

AI vs Security Architects - Augmentation, Not Replacement

Are AI systems replacing security roles? Maybe not the way most people assume. AI isn't eliminating architects — it's augmenting them. Architects sit at the strategic layer: influence, prioritization, long-term posture. AI’s power isn’t replacing that judgment — it’s continuously surfacing what matters, validating configurations, and helping teams scale impact without hiring “more architects.” "If I say something should be done, I need a way to know whether it was done correctly — and continuously.".

The Mythical 1+1=3 Model in Cybersecurity

The mythical 1+1=3 model in security? It happens when the tools you already own stop working in isolation — and start working as a system. Jay Wilson and Garrett Hamilton dig into why Reach’s platform approach matters: not just enhancing individual controls, but creating compounding value across identity, endpoint, email, and network. When visibility, configuration, and enforcement align, the outcome isn’t incremental — it’s exponential.

Reach Security Joins the Microsoft for Startups Pegasus Program to Accelerate Agentic AI for E3/E5 Security Optimization

Reach Security announces its acceptance into the Microsoft for Startups Pegasus Program. Through the Pegasus Program, Reach will collaborate with Microsoft to help enterprise customers optimize their use of Microsoft E3 and E5 security suites by addressing configuration, visibility, and operational gaps through agentic AI.

Reach Security Ranked #5 on the TechRound100 | Exposing and Fixing Real Security Risk

Honored to share that Reach Security has been named on the TechRound100, recognizing the most impactful and innovative startups of the year. This milestone reflects the problem we’re focused on solving: most organizations don’t lack tools—they lack visibility into how those tools are actually deployed. By exposing misconfigurations, shallow deployments, and missing protections, Reach helps teams fix the risks that matter most before they become incidents.

Zero Trust That Actually Works: How Reach Maps NIST & CISA Frameworks Into Real Security Gains

Most organizations don’t lack intent; they lack a clear understanding of what’s deployed today, what gaps matter most, and how to turn guidance into enforceable baselines. Reach connects to your existing security tools and automatically maps configurations to established maturity models like CISA’s Zero Trust Maturity Model 2.0 — producing a real-time posture assessment across identity, device, endpoint, email, and network with no surveys or guesswork.

Threat Exposure Management: A Better Way to Answer "How Exposed Are We?"

Security leaders are asking a new question with greater urgency: How exposed are we? In an era where every application, identity, and integration expands the attack surface, answering that question with clarity is no longer optional. The traditional model of vulnerability management cannot keep up. Findings come in faster than they can be addressed. Visibility is fragmented. Risk prioritization is often based on severity scores rather than business impact.