Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Every security leader has a version of the network in their head. They know which systems should be segmented, which applications should be reachable, which ports should never be open, and which access paths should not exist. They know how the architecture is supposed to work. The harder question is whether the live environment is actually enforcing that design right now. That question is getting more difficult to answer.

Security teams spend enormous energy responding to threats, but many of the most damaging incidents trace back to a surprisingly simple failure: the organization didn't have an accurate picture of what it owned, what was exposed, and what its tools were actually doing about it. That gap between assumed coverage and actual coverage is where attackers operate, and adding more tools doesn't fix the underlying visibility problem.

Vulnerability scanning gives security teams a starting point, but it has never been the whole picture. Scan results capture known CVEs across applications and systems, yet they say nothing about whether a given weakness is actually reachable, whether the controls around it are functioning correctly, or whether the people with access to it represent a meaningful risk. Exposure management addresses all of that.

The Microsoft Defender Security Research Team and Microsoft Threat Intelligence documented a campaign in which Storm-2949 abused Microsoft Entra ID accounts to exfiltrate data from Microsoft 365 and Azure environments. The attack shows how cloud intrusions increasingly unfold through identity systems, administrative features, and legitimate platform capabilities rather than obvious malware or traditional endpoint compromise.

On April 22, 2026, Google's Threat Intelligence Group and Mandiant disclosed a campaign by a threat actor they're tracking as UNC6692. The group breached enterprise networks by impersonating IT helpdesk staff over Microsoft Teams, ultimately exfiltrating Active Directory databases and achieving full domain compromise. What's notable about UNC6692 is what they didn't do. They didn't use a zero-day. They didn't exploit a software vulnerability.

A new research report from Reach Security reveals that misconfigured security controls, configuration drift, and unused capabilities across an organization’s existing security technology stack are a primary driver of cybersecurity risk.

Upgrading Microsoft enterprise licenses from E3 to E5 or from Entra ID Plan 1 to Plan 2? Whether your company is making the move or evaluating it, the key question is: How do you turn licensing changes into real security gains? Platformizing remains a major trend in 2025, and Microsoft often sits at the center of these efforts due to its broad security capabilities. But maximizing value from E3 and E5 licenses requires time, expertise, and contextual understanding of your environment.

In 2025, organizations spent billions on security, deploying EDR/XDR, SASE, firewalls, identity platforms, email security, web security, and more. And yet, breaches persist. The reason often is not a zero-day, an advanced persistent threat, or a cutting-edge exploit. It is far more mundane. Misconfigurations across identity, endpoint, network, and email/web security controls remain among the top root causes of incidents.