Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

Point an AI model at a security stack it doesn't fully understand and you get confident, wrong answers faster. Reach gives your AI a source of truth for security controls. The MCP Server connects MCP-compatible AI tools directly to Reach. The Public API brings Reach findings and evidence into SIEM, ticketing, and GRC workflows. The MCP Server is intentionally read-only, so your team decides when recommendations become actions.

Every security configuration has a backstory. Drift History takes you down memory lane. See what changed, when it changed, who made the change, and how your team responded along the way. Then fix what still needs attention.

"The problems we solve are not sexy." But they are hyper-relevant and important. Garrett Hamilton joined Moudy Elbayadi, Ph.D. on Inflection Point: Digital Intelligence Podcast. He explains why Reach goes after problems that have been around for decades, that matter, and that nobody wants to own. He covers why these problems have lasted so long and why they are now possible to fix at scale.

Reach analyzed a year of telemetry from more than 50 production environments. The average organization generated 13 configuration drift alerts per day. 12 of them traced to a genuine, risk-prioritized exposure. A 92% signal rate on a category of alert most teams treat as background noise. The full report is out now. Security Intent vs. Security Reality: Configuration Drift in the Age of AI.

The problems we solve are not sexy. That is Garrett Hamilton on Inflection Point: Digital Intelligence Podcast, and he means it as a badge of honor. Problems that have been around for 30 years are rarely glamorous. They are also the ones that take the business down when they go wrong. Why is it more important than ever to tackle these problems?

Security used to mean locking the doors and the windows. Networks are open now, and every new tool, integration, and workflow adds another way in. A device can report EDR installed and still carry an exclusion someone added on a Sunday two years ago. Deployment is easy to confirm. How the control is running is the harder question. Garrett Hamilton and Moudy Elbayadi get into it on Inflection Point: Digital Intelligence.

AI-powered attacks, meet AI-powered defense. Reach Security's rebranded site is live today. Most of what changed came from customers. Security leaders have been telling us they need a faster, more continuous way to know where their controls are weak, understand what matters most, and close the gaps before attackers exploit them. Our new website reflects that signal. It brings greater clarity to the problem we solve, the category we are building, and how Reach helps security teams identify blind spots, prioritize action, guide remediation, and continuously validate the controls they already own.

Close control gaps before AI attacks find them Reach connects to the security tools you already own, finds the controls that are misconfigured or sitting unused, and watches for drift so gaps get closed before an attacker gets there.

A firewall rule set to allow any source to any destination can stay live for months. It cancels out the rules beneath it and lets traffic pass unchecked. That kind of drift sets off no alarm. It builds up between quarterly reviews, while small teams govern 50 or more firewalls and hundreds of rule changes a week. Reach Network Security Assurance finds these controls, shows how long each has been open, ties the finding to real exposure, and guides the fix.

Firewalls are the single most common source of misconfiguration-related breaches, yet they get changed a hundred times a week and audited once a quarter. This is the network security gap AI attackers exploit first. Endpoint gets the budget. Identity gets the roadmap. The firewall gets changed constantly and reviewed rarely. It is also the control most tied to breaches: 42% of security teams pinned a firewall misconfiguration to a breach or near miss last year, ahead of EDR at 40% and identity at 39%.