Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

The Hidden Dangers of Legacy PAM: Why Your Security Solution May Actually Be a Risk

As a former federal CISO who has spent decades designing and securing enterprise infrastructure, I’ve grown increasingly concerned as organizations continue to rely on legacy Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions designed for a different era. These systems, once the gold standard in security, have become dangerous liabilities in today’s modern cloud-native world.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Implementing PAM Solutions

Protecting your company's most sensitive systems and data is no longer optional. With the cybercriminals relentlessly trying to get in, your mistake of not offering enough security could become a reason for theft and data breaches. Privileged access management has become a critical component of cybersecurity. PAM provides a strong security framework that allows organizations to control and monitor sensitive data and systems.

AM, PAM, IGA and ADM: Key differences, and how to unify them

Identity management acronyms aren’t anyone’s idea of a fun day out, but successfully securing identities requires carefully stitching together each of these acronyms into a comprehensive identity security solution. In this article, we discuss AM, PAM, IGA, ADM – and how a unified identity platform (UIP) can help you tie them all together. Let’s start by defining each of these acronyms.

Privileged Access for Modern Infrastructure: The Top Four Challenges

As organizations have transitioned from legacy IT infrastructure to cloud-native, ephemeral modern infrastructure, the needs of how privileged access is handled have shifted, too. Modern infrastructure presents unique challenges that legacy Privileged Access Management (PAM) tools, originally architected for more static environments, weren’t designed to handle. In this post, we explore why characteristics of modern infrastructure require a modern approach to PAM.