The persistent shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals which grew by 26.2% over the past year, coupled with the fact that global cyberattacks increased 38% in 2022, means organizations are increasingly looking to security automation to help the cybersecurity teams keep pace. In fact, 98% of respondents to our “2022 State of Cybersecurity Automation Adoption” survey say they have increased their automation budgets.
The rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity is witnessing the genesis of new paradigms, redefining the ways we perceive threat detection and response. Traditional approaches to cybersecurity are proving less effective against the sophistication of modern cyber threats. Among the many possible solutions, the integration of Threat Intelligence (TI) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as an impressive contender, aiming to set a new standard in the industry.
While artificial intelligence (AI) has been the hot topic of this year, a theme that I continue to see is that AI is being used for good and evil. I'm going to dive more into key takeaways your organization can learn from Catherine Williams, Threat Intelligence Specialist at Telecom giant BT. Get her insights on AI being on two sides of the battlefield, and why everyone should start integrating cybersecurity in their everyday tasks now.
With the increasing frequency of cyber-attacks, businesses need to prioritize proactive early incident detection. In this blog, we will highlight the significance of a high-quality threat intelligence solution in building a well-rounded and proactive defense strategy. In an era defined by pervasive connectivity, businesses of all sizes find themselves grappling with an escalating threat of cyber-attacks.
In today’s digital world, cybersecurity threats are on the rise, and businesses must stay vigilant to protect their sensitive data from cybercriminals. To combat these threats, companies often rely on cybersecurity information vendors to provide them with intelligence information. However, the quality of the intelligence information provided by these vendors has come under scrutiny, and there have been concerns about the accuracy and effectiveness of the information provided.
During a red team assessment for a client, Charles Fol and Dany Bach from LEXFO, discovered a heap overflow bug in Fortigate’s SSL VPN that can be exploited to achieve remote code execution on Fortigate instances. This vulnerability is reachable without authentication, and can be used to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems, which could lead to a complete compromise of the system.
In early June, multiple threat researchers observed attacks on MOVEit servers using a zero day vulnerability that facilitated data exfiltration. MOVEit Transfer is a managed file transfer software that supports the exchange of files and data. This vulnerability allows an attacker to gain access to the database and possibly infer information about the structure and contents of the database.
Every five to ten years, major technology shifts change the way that vulnerability assessment and the related IT risk mitigation processes are approached or implemented. What has remained constant is the formula we use to measure risk and thus prioritize and triage vulnerabilities. Risk = (Likelihood of event) * (Impact of consequences) It’s an approach that intuitively makes sense, but there have been two challenges with how this formula has been applied.
