Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

For years, security teams have built behavioral models around people. We learned that valid credentials only tell so much. A user can have legitimate access to a system and still behave in a way that deserves attention, which is why UEBA became such an important part of modern security operations today – intersecting data from multiple sources over extended periods of time to build a story indicating risk has become an essential tool to identify malicious actors, both insiders and outsiders.

User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) tools are essential cybersecurity solutions, helping organizations to detect anomalous activities and hidden threats. In this article, we explore the top 10 UEBA tools on the market today. You’ll learn about their key features, use cases, pricing, and customer experiences.

User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) is a cybersecurity technology that uses machine learning and risk scoring to detect threats by analyzing user and entity behavior patterns. UEBA establishes behavioral baselines for users, devices, and applications, then identifies anomalies that may indicate insider threats, compromised accounts, or advanced attacks that traditional security tools miss.

Insider threats remain one of the most challenging security risks organizations face. Unlike external attackers who must breach perimeters, insiders already possess legitimate access to critical systems and data. They understand security controls, know where valuable assets reside, and can operate under the radar of traditional rule-based detection systems for extended periods.

At.conf25, we announced how Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) has transformed to today’s AI-powered SecOps platform—unifying industry-leading technologies across SIEM, SOAR, User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA), threat intelligence, and detection engineering with purpose-built AI across the entire Threat Detection, Investigation, and Response (TDIR) workflow—empowering Security Operations Centers (SOCs) to end analyst fatigue, deliver faster security outcomes, reduce risk, and build r

11 days. That’s the global median dwell time for attackers in 2024,down from 26 days when external entities notify, but still long enough to cause significant damage. Your firewalls? They’re stopping known signatures. Endpoint tools see individual machines. But the network layer, where attackers actually move around, escalate privileges, steal sensitive data, that’s often a blind spot.

The cybersecurity industry is facing a new challenge: AI-generated attacks. With the rapid advancement of generative AI, cybercriminals now have access to sophisticated tools that enable them to craft highly targeted attacks with minimal technical expertise. Unlike traditional attack methods that require deep programming knowledge, AI-driven attacks allow even non-technical malicious actors to create malware, exploit scripts, and launch phishing campaigns with ease.

Attackers are becoming more sophisticated and stealthier. Their methods are more advanced. Of these advanced methods, living-off-the-land (LOTL) attacks are the sneakiest and most effective. By using legitimate tools and processes already in your environment, malicious actors can get what they want without being seen. But with the Exabeam New-Scale Security Operations Platform and our industry leading user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), security teams can stop them.

The way we detect cyber threats has come a long way, but let’s be real—traditional methods have serious blind spots. Back in the day, we relied on correlation rules—basic if-this-then-that logic—to flag suspicious activity. It worked… sort of. But today, exponential data growth has limited the effectiveness of using only correlation rules to detect threats. The result?

Insider risk management is more critical than ever as human error and insider threats drive escalating security breaches. While many organizations have adopted User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) to monitor potential risks, relying solely on UEBA may fall short of the depth needed to stay ahead of these increasingly complex threats.