Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

As artificial intelligence becomes deeply woven into daily workflows, employees are adopting unapproved AI apps at an unprecedented pace. According to Teramind’s Shadow AI Behavior Report, a staggering 89% of workplace AI usage occurs outside enterprise-governed channels, leaving 86% of organizations blind as to how corporate data flows in and out of these tools.

Jailbreak prompts (i.e. prompts designed to remove or bypass the guardrails and rules that govern AI systems, like LLMs) prompts have been circulating for years. At first, a lot of it was pretty simple: copy a prompt, tell the model to ignore its rules, and see what happens. It was also largely noisy, unverified, and often didn’t work. But the noise was still telling us something. Threat actors were beginning to study AI systems the same way defenders were, and over time, the goal started to change.

Most organizations spent years hardening their software supply chain. The model is familiar: dependencies flow through a controlled repository, policies determine what is allowed, scanning catches what slips through, and every action is logged for auditability. It works because human developers operate within environments that enforce these rules. AI coding agents break that assumption entirely.

Protecting sensitive data is no longer just a compliance objective. It has become a prerequisite for adopting cloud services, enabling AI, and maintaining customer trust. Yet many organizations still struggle to balance innovation with effective data governance. A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Microsoft found that organizations using mature data protection capabilities, including data loss prevention (DLP), achieved a 30% reduction in the likelihood of data breaches.

A study has found that AI chatbots can be more effective at social engineering than human scammers, WIRED reports. The researchers looked at a form of romance scam commonly known as “pig butchering,” in which scammers spend weeks or months building a relationship with the victim before tricking them into sending money for a phony investment scheme.

AI is making social engineering attacks significantly more effective, according to a new report from cyber insurance firm Resilience. These attacks were behind more than 85% of losses in the first half of 2026, compared to less than 20% during H1 2024. “Losses tied to phishing, social engineering, and transfer fraud have climbed from 17.7% of incurred losses in H1 2024 to 85.3% in H1 2026, the single largest increase in the report’s five half-year comparison,” Resilience says.

For twenty years, the software security playbook has worked the same way. You find the vulnerability, score it, open a ticket, assign it to a human, wait for the fix, ship the patch, and prove it happened. Every step in that sequence assumes humans can review each fix individually and still keep up. Frontier AI broke that assumption. The exploit window has collapsed from weeks to hours. Attackers reason across your codebase, chain their findings, and ship exploits before a CVE is even published.