Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

A practical comparison of the leading OT backup and recovery platforms for plant security leads, OT engineers, industrial CISOs and the system integrators who serve them, plus the OT security platforms most often evaluated alongside them.

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) concentrate risk into a narrow window. The moment a deal is announced, employees with access to proprietary research, source code, and unreleased product plans face pressure and opportunity at the same time. Some update their resumes. A smaller number decide to take something with them: a research file, a pricing model, or a customer list before the transition is final. For compliance and security teams, the challenge goes beyond stopping data exfiltration.

Firewall configuration is the set of rules, policies, and settings that define how a firewall behaves. Without configuration, a firewall is hardware and software waiting for instructions. With configuration, it becomes a control that determines what traffic is permitted, what is blocked, and what gets inspected before a decision is made. Get the configuration right, and the firewall does its job. Let it drift, and you have the appearance of protection without the substance of it. This is not an edge case.

Since 26 June 2026, an unattributed threat actor has published at least 292 deceptive brand-impersonation GitHub pages and.github repositories that mimic legitimate software and trusted security tooling vendors, including a fake Arctic Wolf GitHub page. Each repository hosts a marketing-styled README document, with a concealed download link that routes victims to a malicious “secure download” page.

Editor's note: This article was originally published by Tim Erlin on LinkedIn. It has been republished here with the author's permission. It seems like every security vendor now sells "AI security." The WAF companies, the API gateway companies, the cloud platforms, the proxy startups: all of them have an AI story, and most of them have attached one of three labels to it. AI gateway. AI firewall. AI control platform. The terms often get used as if they're interchangeable, but they are not.

Threat actors continue to use AI tools to automate their attack flows and increase efficiency, according to researchers at ReliaQuest.

Coding agents have become one of the fastest-adopted AI technologies in the enterprise. They help developers write code, debug applications, automate repetitive tasks, and ship software faster than ever before. They also introduce a security challenge unlike anything most organizations have faced. Unlike traditional AI assistants that generate content, coding agents take action.

Part 1 made the case that reasonable, point-in-time assurance leaves a risk gap where most enterprise risk accumulates. Now there’s a way to close it.

Organizations keep their databases behind firewalls for a reason: the data inside is the data they can least afford to lose. A new class of AI middleware–Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers–exists specifically to reach into those protected systems on an AI model's behalf. One of them, DBHub, connects directly to SQL databases.

Phishing sites now live for under 24 hours. By the time a manual review cycle completes, the credential harvesting is done. That window is why threat intelligence automation has moved from a nice-to-have to an operational necessity for security and fraud teams managing external threats. Threat intelligence automation solves the prioritization problem by enriching raw signals before they reach analysts.