Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

GitHub disclosed that attackers accessed its internal repositories after compromising an employee device through a poisoned Visual Studio Code extension. The company said the activity appears limited to GitHub-owned internal repositories, with the attacker’s claim of roughly 3,800 repositories being “directionally consistent” with its investigation. GitHub also said it found no evidence that customers’ own enterprises, organizations or repositories were impacted.

Trust is expensive. The wrong zero trust network security tool can leave you with more standing access and more risk than you started with. In today’s modern and complex environments, this sentiment matters more than ever. 22% of breaches involved credential abuse as the initial access vector. In this guide, we break down the best zero trust network security tools by category, helping you choose the optimal solution for your requirements.

The shift-left approach and prioritizing security from the very beginning of the coding process are what the tech industry talks endlessly about. Yet, many DevOps teams falsely believe that simply scanning code makes them secure. The harsh reality is that your CI/CD pipeline is rarely guarded with the same level of rigor and monitoring as the production environment it serves.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) has become a critical capability for organizations navigating increasingly sophisticated cyber threats, expanding attack surfaces, and growing operational complexity. But despite significant investments in MDR services, many organizations still struggle with delayed investigations, missed detections, and inconsistent visibility across their environments. The issue is often not the MDR provider itself. It is the telemetry.

Suppose that the hospital allows a vital software update of its infusion pumps to go through, and all security tests pass. The signature looks valid. The certificate is scrapless. Everything appears legitimate. The update was forged by an attacker who cracked a key that was considered unbreakable just five years ago. The general perception of most individuals is that after encryption or after data is digitally signed, it stays secure indefinitely. That assumption is now perilously outdated.

America's cybersecurity agency left its production credentials sitting in a public GitHub repo for six months. The same failure pattern is now being automated by AI agents in every enterprise running Cursor, Claude Desktop, or Copilot.

Once your migration plan to Tines Cases is in place, the next priority is ensuring the transition sticks. This is part three of our series on migrating to Tines Cases and will cover the operational side of migration: communicating the changes to your team, running a smooth parallel period, planning for rollback if needed, and ensuring reporting and compliance don’t miss a beat. These are the steps that turn a successful technical migration into a successful adoption.

Migrating from your previous ticketing platform to Tines Cases is a straightforward project when you break it into manageable steps. This is part two of our Tines Cases guide and walks through those steps and provides practical advice on how to avoid common pitfalls, keep your migration on schedule, and end up with a well-structured Cases environment from day one.