Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

In 2026, the stakes around identity security are higher than ever, and choosing the right multi-factor authentication (MFA) provider can directly influence how resilient your organization is against modern attacks. Cybercriminals are increasingly bypassing weak or legacy authentication using phishing, credential stuffing, and social engineering, which makes static passwords alone effectively obsolete.

A few years ago, during a routine investigation after a phishing incident, the security team believed the damage was contained. During the attack, one employee’s laptop was compromised. The security team removed the malware and the password was reset. But the next morning, when analysts started reviewing authentication logs, something odd appeared. The same compromised account had logged into three internal servers overnight. Then a database server. Then a backup controller.

Ask anyone what they think when a website requests a driver's license, Social Security number, or email address, and you'll hear the same reaction: "Why do they need that?" It’s a fair question. Not a day goes by without news of another data breach or scam. Many people have either experienced fraud firsthand or know someone who has. While they're more aware of the need to protect their data, they don't feel equipped to actually do it.

New age mandates continue to emerge across the world. For product managers, compliance officers, and legal professionals responsible for implementing age assurance, understanding internationally recognized frameworks is essential. ISO 27566 and IEEE 2089 are the two leading internationally recognized standards for age assurance referenced by regulatory bodies creating guidelines for recent age mandates. While both standards address age assurance, they serve complementary purposes.

For years, cybersecurity relied on a secure network perimeter, where users were trusted once inside. This approach was effective when everything was contained in a controlled environment, but it no longer works today. Modern organizations operate across cloud platforms, SaaS, mobile devices, and distributed teams. Employees and partners connect from various locations while APIs exchange data. As a result, the traditional network boundary no longer exists.

If you’re using an Identity and Access Management (IAM) solution for safeguarding employee and customer accounts, then you must know about the IAM security risks. This is to account for the possible gaps and work on them. Identity security risks are no longer limited to not meeting checklists, but have shifted to a dynamic approach. A continuous, real-time, and risk-based approach is the new norm.

Consider this: Your employees log in through Azure AD. Your contractors use Google. Your vendors authenticate via Okta. Your JSM customers are on AWS Cognito. Four identity systems. One Atlassian instance. And natively, only one identity provider is allowed. That is not a configuration oversight, it is a hard limit built into Atlassian Cloud.

Most organizations don’t struggle with managing devices in the beginning. A few laptops, some smartphones and tablets, everything feels under control. The problem starts when things scale. More devices get added. Teams start working remotely. Different operating systems and use cases come into play. Over time, it becomes harder to track what’s connected, what’s updated, and what’s secure. That’s when endpoint management stops being optional.

As Shopify stores scale, product visibility needs to be more controlled; merchants handling different customer types often prefer not to expose products to everyone. Whether you’re managing B2B catalogs or exclusive offerings, the ability to restrict products by customer tags in Shopify becomes essential. While customer tags are useful for categorization, Shopify doesn’t provide built-in functionality to link those tags with product visibility.