Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

When you need to use a proxy to keep your zero trust environment secure, it often comes with a cost: poor performance for your users. Soon after deploying a client proxy, security teams are generally slammed with support tickets from users frustrated with sluggish browser speed, slow file transfers, and video calls glitching at just the wrong moment. After a while, you start to chalk it up to the proxy — potentially blinding yourself to other issues affecting performance.

New research shows the cybersecurity workforce is undergoing a major shift as AI transforms security operations. While leaders remain deeply committed to the field, many are facing increasing burnout, evolving skill demands, and growing responsibility for governing AI-driven systems. The future cybersecurity leader will need to balance technical expertise with communication, business alignment, and AI oversight.

For many engineering teams, CI/CD security appears to be working. Static scans run automatically. Vulnerabilities are flagged. Security checks exist somewhere in the pipeline. Yet issues still surface after release. The reason is rarely the absence of tools. More often, it is the absence of structural enforcement across the build lifecycle. Security controls run inside the pipeline, but they do not always guarantee that the artifact being tested is the same artifact that ultimately reaches users.

AI and automation are embedded in daily work. Copilots draft content and pull in customer context. Agents triage tickets, update records, and trigger workflows across Slack, Salesforce, Jira, and GitHub. In engineering, this acceleration shows up in scripts, CI/CD pipelines, and infrastructure automation that depend on secrets to ship and operate software.

AI coding assistants are quietly resurrecting millions of abandoned open source packages. For the last decade, developers relied on a simple heuristic for open source security: Prevalence \= Trust. If a package was downloaded millions of times a week (lodash, react, requests), we assumed it was "safe enough" because thousands of eyes were on it. If it was obscure, we approached with caution.

Trust is the most expensive vulnerability in modern security architecture. In recent years, the security industry has pivoted toward a zero trust model for networks — assuming breach and verifying every request. Yet when it comes to the people behind those requests, we often default back to implicit trust. We trust that the person on the Zoom call is who they say they are. We trust that the documents uploaded to an HR portal are genuine. That trust is now being weaponized at an unprecedented scale.