Security | Threat Detection | Cyberattacks | DevSecOps | Compliance

CVE-2026-46817: Oracle EBS Payments Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation

Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) sits at the center of finance, procurement, and payment operations for many large enterprises. When a critical vulnerability surfaces in a module like Oracle Payments, the impact reaches well past IT. It touches financial data, transaction integrity, and regulatory exposure. CVE-2026-46817 is exactly that kind of vulnerability, and it is now being actively exploited.

CVE-2026-33017: Langflow RCE Deploys Monero Miners on AI Servers

Enterprises are standing up AI application frameworks like Langflow faster than security teams can review them. These platforms let teams build and automate generative AI workflows in days instead of months, but that speed comes with a cost: many instances go live with default settings, get exposed to the internet, and never make it onto a security team’s radar. CVE-2026-33017 shows exactly what happens next.

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026: What It Means for Enterprise AI Security

OWASP, the Open Worldwide Application Security Project, has published Top 10 lists for over two decades to help security teams prioritize the risks that matter most. The original OWASP Top 10 for web applications became the industry’s default checklist for application security. When large language models moved into production, OWASP followed with the Top 10 for LLM Applications, addressing risks like prompt injection and sensitive information disclosure in single-turn model responses.

SAST False Positives Are Breaking Your Vulnerability Remediation Workflow

SAST scanners do their job well. The problem is their job stops at flagging vulnerable functions, not confirming whether those functions are reachable in your application. The result is a vulnerability remediation workflow full of findings that developers spend sprint cycles investigating, only to conclude they aren’t exploitable. Seemplicity’s Code Analyst closes that gap before the finding ever hits the queue. Security tools are supposed to make developers’ jobs easier.

DuneSlide: Two Critical RCE vulnerabilities via Zero-Click Prompt Injection in Cursor IDE

Cato AI Labs has discovered two critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in Cursor IDE, the popular development environment which, according to Cursor, is used by over half of the Fortune 500. Both RCE vulnerabilities, which we refer to as “DuneSlide,” achieved a 9.8 CVSS score, and involve breaking out of the IDE’s sandbox environment and were assigned CVE IDs CVE-2026-50548 and CVE-2026-50549.

Intel Chat: Cisco CUCM exploited, ransomware profiles, Gamaredon & AI agent phishing [335]

Intel Chat with Matt Bromiley and Chris Luft. Matt and Chris break down four stories from the week in threat intel: Chapters: The Cybersecurity Defenders Podcast — a podcast about cybersecurity and the people that keep the internet safe. New episodes drop weekly. Subscribe wherever you listen.

Emerging Threat: (CVE-2026-55957) Apache Tomcat Authentication Bypass via JNDIRealm GSSAPI Binds

CVE-2026-55957 is a missing critical step in authentication in Apache Tomcat, present when the JNDIRealm is configured to authenticate binds using GSSAPI. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical), based on network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction.

AI Just Shrank the Time Hackers Need to Weaponize Your Vulnerabilities

The Five Eyes intelligence alliance—NSA, CISA, GCHQ, Australia's ASD, Canada's Cyber Centre, and New Zealand's GCSB—just issued a joint warning: AI has compressed the window between vulnerability discovery and exploitation from years to months. Adrian breaks down what the "AI Shift in Cyber Risk" statement actually means for patching timelines and attacker sophistication—and why most organizations aren't moving fast enough to keep up.

Why Your Asset Counts Are Wrong (And What to Do About It)

If you've ever pulled an asset count from one tool and compared it to another, you've probably noticed they don't match. The discrepancy isn’t minor, either. The difference is likely to be substantial. One scanner says you have 4,200 assets. Your CMDB says 3,800. Your cloud inventory says 1,100. None of them agree, and none of them are right. That's not a data hygiene problem you can solve with a spreadsheet cleanup.